When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a member of the “B” (W.bebe) in the Internet daily newspaper (W.B) and no person may conceal any false fact openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any other person and damage the honor of any other person.

Although the former owner of the Victim C’s Masan-si’s Masan did not have existed as D, and the victim did not have acquired the said Mansan with preferential treatment from D on August 14, 2017, the Defendant, around 08:35, at the coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “F” on the daily bes political bulletin board in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, is a title, and “C Mansan Mansan Mal Mal Mal 100 square meters.”

The low-income house surrounded by the forest was larger than possible to take aviation pictures, and there was a few houses of inside the United Nations, but it was started on the Berne Day.

However, if the copy of the register is removed, the former owner is D.

At the time of participation of the government, it is suspected that C is not given preferential treatment after G subsidized by the National Treasury.

D and C, C, H, H, and C’s candlelight, I’s impeachment and confinement, and C’s integration) were posted.

Accordingly, the defendant up to public false information, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Written accusation (to be accompanied by the closure data of a sign and a certified copy of C Yangsan-si registry);

1. We vindicate that the response (the response to data on the daily Vietnam site), the investigation report (the confirmation of the personal information of the owner prior to the two-way possession of this case), the investigation report (the confirmation that the CD bankruptcy was not the administrator of this case), the investigation report (the political inclinations of the website of the daily Vietnam storage), the investigation report (the confirmation of the political inclinations of the CBS storage site), and the telephone communications with the owner prior to the CBS home), / [the defendant is merely the fact of this case's defamation that he moved to another political site at the level of suspicion.

However, the former owner of the victim's home is the victim.