출입국관리법위반방조
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged and C are aware that the D of the nationality of Pakistanan does not qualify for refugee status as an application for refugee status;
D. D. H. H. H.D.
In order to provide employment activities in one citizen country, C's foreigner registration certificate that can be used for employment activities was lent to the public and offered to receive KRW 500,000 per month in return.
On March 15, 2013, the Defendant and C jointly lent D's foreign registration certificate to assist D's employment activities from F located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, in order to help D's employment activities, and D's above foreign registration certificate was presented to G's staff in the process of health examinations for employment around January 14, 2013, and around April 15, 2013, the Defendant and C proposed the above foreign registration certificate to the staff in charge in charge in the course of employment in the process of employment in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. defense Dong-gu.
As a result, the defendant and C made it easy for D to commit a crime so that D could not use another's foreigner registration certificate in an illegal manner.
2. The gist of the defendant's prosecutorial suit was the defendant's life together with the defendant's species C, who is the type of death of this species. At the time, the defendant was married with the defendant.
D has been playing frequently in the office of the defendant.
Russatus
On June 2013, C became aware of the fact that there was no foreign registration certificate of this case that is placed above the Defendant's house cooling house.
The Defendant and C did not lend the instant alien registration certificate to D.
D It is inferred that D will play in the defendant's office and take the foreign registration certificate of this case.
3. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there is a statement by H that “The Defendant and C were to pay KRW 500,000 per month to the Defendant and C, and used the instant foreign registration certificate,” and that “The Defendant and C were to deliver a foreign registration certificate to D from Daegu on March 2013” was a statement by H.
However, each of the above statements of D and H is difficult to believe as follows, and other statements submitted by the prosecutor.