In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

1. The Defendants’ co-injury, around October 29, 2013, became a vision for the following reasons: (a) around D in front of D located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul; and (b) Defendant B took a bath to the victim E (the age of 58).

Defendant

B prices the face of the victim in drinking twice, and the defendant A prices the victim's side by drinking once and the victim's back head by using "Twitter", a sports organization in front of D, which is a sports organization.

As a result, the defendants jointly put up the victim about three weeks of medical treatment, such as a diversary diversical dives, etc.

2. Defendant B’s assaulted Defendant B at the time, time, and place under Paragraph (1) of this Article, for the foregoing reasons, and used the victim F (years 60) at a reasonable price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of defendants A, E, F, and G;

1. Each protocol of the police interrogation of the Defendants, E, F, and G (including questioning);

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (E);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: Article 2(2) and (1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), the selection of fines, etc.

1. Defendant B from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;