When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 27, 2014, at around 21:10, the Defendant assaulted the victim, on the ground that the alcohol level was frightened by the victim C (n, 53 years of age) operated by the Dacro-gun B, Geongdong-gun, and on the ground that the alcohol level was frightened by the Docro, the beer’s face was rootsd in the victim’s face, and the victim was under contact with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Partial statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant;

1. Statement made to C by the police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site visit, etc.) and investigation report (in addition to field photographs);

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on August 10, 2012 by the Gwangju District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc. on the part of August 10, 2012 and was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case; and the defendant cannot be deemed to have shown that he had shown her repent even if

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).