임대차보증금반환
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
On April 3, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with C’s son D on April 3, 2009, under which the deposit for lease was KRW 65 million with respect to the registration of the land E-building in Busan, Jin-gu, Busan, and the Defendant, a deceptive act, asserts that the Defendant is liable for compensation for the Plaintiff’s damage, in collusion with C, etc. while carrying out an important role in relation to the above lease agreement and by deceiving
In addition, the circumstances alleged by the Plaintiff are insufficient to recognize that the Defendant conspired with C, etc. to commit a tort, such as acquiring a lease deposit from the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.