However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 1, 2017, the Defendant used a person in front of the apartment house in Gangseo-si, Gangseo-gu, 19:15.

“The” refers to “The e of the Gangseo-gu Police Station D District of the Gangseo-gu Police Station, which is called to the site after receiving a report 112 and intends to move the injured to the 119 first-aid vehicle,” without any reason, to “the e of the flab fe of the flab fe of the flab

Before having expressed the desire to “E”, E expressed the motive to “A” due to the Defendant’s house, E expressed the desire to “I impule, I would like to kill, I would like to die,” and assault E’s face on one hand with the hand floor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;