공문서변조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, a national of the People's Republic of China, entered the Republic of China as a foreigner for a specific activity (E-7) on July 30, 2009, and did not depart despite the expiration of the period of stay on July 30, 2010, but was married with a female of the Republic of Korea on November 16, 2016, and obtained the status of stay for a citizen (F-6).
1. On April 2016, the Defendant and the single-name “C” jointly committed a crime requesting the issuance of a driver’s license to the so-called “C” to the so-called “C”, which mediates the issuance of a driver’s license, as the Defendant did not depart from the Republic of Korea even after the expiration of the period of sojourn and did not obtain a driver’s license due to an illegal sojourn status while staying in the Republic of Korea.
The defendant, along with the "C" that consented to the above request, proposed that the defendant acquire the driver's license by arbitrarily modifying the period of stay of the foreigner's registration certificate issued by the head of the Suwon Immigration Affairs Office and submitting it to the Road Traffic Authority.
A. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant changed his/her official document, and changed his/her foreigner registration certificate as if the Defendant had been a lawful resident of the Republic of Korea on the back of the period of stay in the Defendant’s foreigner registration certificate by stating that the Defendant’s alteration or alteration of his/her official document was “C” at the examination site of the 90-1 Road Traffic Authority, which is the Jin-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, and “C” at the back of the period of stay in the Defendant’s foreigner registration certificate.
After that, the defendant presented the altered alien registration certificate to the employee in charge of receiving a license from the Road Traffic Authority at the above-mentioned driver's license examination site on the same day along with C.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with “C”, alters one copy of an alien registration certificate against the Defendant under the name of the head of the immigration control office, which is an official document, for the purpose of uttering, and presents the altered alien registration certificate as if it were genuine.