If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On July 11, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 08:05, and led the Defendant to proceed along the two-lanes from the side of the Taeduk-dong Taeduk Village in order to pass along the intersection in front of the Taeduk-dong, Taeduk-dong.

At the same time, all vehicles have the duty of care to drive safely by checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are temporarily temporarily set up immediately before or after the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop at a stop line without stopping it, and followed by the negligence of proceeding at the stop line, and the part of the victim D (I, 56 years old) driven by the victim D (I, I, 56 years old) driving to the right-hand village, the right-hand side of the KS3 car driving from the direction of the defendant's running direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the Defendant driver F (V, 41 years of age) on the Defendant’s driver’s knife and tensions, finites and tensions, and on the part of the Defendant’s driver’s knife, finites and tensions, which require approximately four weeks of treatment to the Defendant’s driver’s knife and driver’s knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that there is no criminal record except for the defendant who has been sentenced once a fine, and vehicles operated by the defendant are covered by comprehensive insurance, and the defendant is the victims.