beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.09.14 2017구합21090

해상여객운송사업 면허처분 취소의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

(c) shall be.

(4) The evaluation criteria for the selection of the maritime passenger transport service providers and the evaluation criteria for the maritime transport (hereinafter “in-house maritime transport notification criteria”) are as follows:

Evaluation criteria for allocation of evaluation items to 100

Ⅰ. Business performance capabilities 45

1. Financial soundness 20 - The credit rating issued by a credit rating agency for the public tender of 20 credit rating (credit rating) shall be assessed in accordance with corporate bonds, corporate bills, and corporate credit rating issued by the credit rating agency;

2. Plans for safety management 10 - Appropriateness of the safety management plan for passenger ships with a propriety of 10 passenger ships, whether to employ personnel exclusively in charge of securing and taking charge of the safety management system for ship companies;

3. Whether the adequate manpower input plan 15 - Whether the captain and crew members of passenger ships are secured, or not the adequate land manpower are secured, such as ticket personnel;

Ⅱ. Business plan 5

1. 35 - The number of points from 25 new shipbuilding to 25, the age of 20 to 20, and the number of points from 20 to 5, respectively, of a vessel * The number of points from 1 year under the age of 1 shall be one.

- 10 early inputs of passenger ships

2. A vessel operation plan 10 - The convenience of users, the number of flights 10 to the appropriateness of the flight plan, the number of flights at the port of call, the number of flights, etc.;

3. Vessel mooring facilities, convenience facilities for users 10 - Rights to use 10 vessel mooring facilities, vessel mooring facilities, and terminals for securing convenience facilities, such as securing convenience facilities (within 3 points), the person who opens a new port (within 2 points), whether convenient mobility equipment is installed under the Act on Promotion of the Transportation Convenience of Mobility Disadvantaged Persons (1 points), such as the history of marine accidents, penalty surcharges, etc. (3 points), and the standards for giving notice of inland sea transportation (2 points) by the evaluation of the degree of customer satisfaction;

C. In accordance with the public notice of this case, the intervenor alone (hereinafter referred to as “the project proposal”) shall be deemed to be the Defendant on October 28, 2016.