However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Between September 15:40 on September 20, 2018 and around 16:25, the Defendant: (a) “E restaurant” for the operation of the victim D in Ansan-si, the members of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si; (b) opened the restaurant room under the influence of alcohol while drinking; and (c) changed the damaged person out of the restaurant.

At the request of the cafeteria, the cafeteria that was kept in the cafeteria, and the cafeteria that read “Cines” and “opens”, opened the cafeteria, and the cellular phone and the main disease were put on the road in the front of the cafeteria, and again, read the cafeteria into the cafeteria, and lost the bit of bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bitch. Handphone.

(d) Finding off the death.

The cafeteria expressed a large lux, and the customers who provided meals in the restaurant were allowed to get out of the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D and F;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the facts charged are recognized, the fact that the victim agreed with, and the fact that there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine) or more;