2. The crime of this case is deemed to be insulting by the Defendant’s dumping the alcohol and alcohol or repeating the vehicle free of duty on four occasions during a short period of time. The crime of this case is deemed to have been insultd by the police officer called out, and the liability for the crime is not somewhat less than ten times, but the Defendant has a criminal record of a fine of the same kind; on the other hand, the Defendant recognized all the facts charged in this case and reflects his mistake; the Defendant paid damages to the victim C and the J. The Defendant agreed to pay damages to the Defendant; the victim N expressed his intention not to punish the Defendant at an investigative agency; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime; and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relationship, etc., are considered, and thus, the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit. Therefore, the prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.