except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 24, 2014, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) extracted a so-called “Samper 44-10, located in the same 4:00 Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City,” the victim B (the age of 52) who is a member of the native folks meeting and the victim was able to take a simplified test and talked on the road; (b) on the ground that the victim was able to take a bath, the Defendant took up the so-called “Samper” pole at a level of 1m in length, which is a dangerous object being sticked on a a simplified test, and took time off the victim’s left side.

Accordingly, the Defendant, carrying dangerous objects, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of criminal implements;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Crimes of Type 6 (Habitual Offense, Cumulative Offense, Special Violence) (Special Mitigation) (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act). The scope of mitigation (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act [Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution] is many previous crimes of violence, but it is against the law,