When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 16, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business for approximately 30 minutes, including, but not limited to, the victim D (35 taxes) who is the owner of a plant, on the ground that, within the scope of “C” food located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, the head of the plant, the head of which, on the ground that the Defendant was not the owner of the plant, “fembly,” which is the owner of the plant, was not the owner of the plant.”

2. On April 16, 2016, when the victim E, a police officer called up at the same time and place as paragraph (1) on April 16, 2016, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of interference with his/her business, the Defendant informed the Defendant of his/her right to the Defendant. The Defendant “Is the victim’s right to the Defendant,” i.e., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., and f., f., f., f.,

In the situation where many and unspecified people view the victim as a "public bath", the victim was publicly insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;