A. 1) On February 24, 2004, the Plaintiff leased KRW 70,00,00 to the Defendant at an interest rate of KRW 4% per month, and February 23, 2005. On the same day, the Defendant’s father C guaranteed the Defendant’s debt against the Plaintiff. 2) On October 16, 2004, the Plaintiff concluded a mortgage contract with the Defendant on each land of KRW 1,51 square meters per annum and 1,425 square meters per annum owned by it, 30,000,000,000 per annum 360,000,000,000,000 won per annum 30,000,0000 won per annum 5,000,000,000 won per annum 30,0000,000 won per annum 630,0000,000 won per annum 5,000,000 won per annum 36,03131,00.

The facts without any dispute (applicable to recognition), Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings (the defendant's defense against Gap evidence No. 1), and the purport of the whole pleadings (the defendant's defense against the defendant's evidence No. 1), but the whole authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established due to the defendant's lack of dispute over the defendant's seal imprint, and according to Gap evidence No. 2, the fact that Eul's certified judicial scrivener confirmed the defendant's intent of borrowing and affixed

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is under special circumstances.