If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a philosolosolosolosophical philosophical.

On December 8, 2011, at around 13:48, the Defendant prepared and submitted a false complaint stating that “In order to have a police officer take criminal punishment under B 51 years of age at the public service center of the Si/Gu police station located in the Si/Gu, Si, Si, Si, Si, Gu, Dong, 59, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant before the Gu, Si, Si, Gun, on November 27, 2011, and submitted a false complaint stating that “In order to punish three persons of limited value by assaulting the Defendant in front of the Gu, Si, Si, Si, Gun.”

On February 1, 2012, around 12:30 on February 1, 2012, the defendant made a false statement that he was abused from D in order to have his wife D (or 50 years of age) imposed criminal punishment when preparing a supplementary statement by the complainant at the criminal office and office of the police station of the previous U.S. police station.

In this respect, the defendant did not appeal B and D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning B and D;

1. The police statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (as to photographing a pantogram photograph of a complainant A, as to photographing a pantogram photograph of the complainant, and as to treatment and confirmation of November 24, 199 by the complainant);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.