However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 20:20 on November 7, 2018, 2018, on the ground that there was drinking together with his wife within the “D” operated by Busan Shipping Daegu B and the Victim C; (b) was scambing with his client and her wife; and (c) was damaged by two (6,000 won at the time of the victim’s possession on the depositor’s surface and one (10,000 won) at the time of the victim’s possession on the inseminator’s surface.

2. At around 20:23 on the same day as Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant received a report that 5:6 wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale b. wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale wale w.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in 112 reported cases.

3. On the same day, around 20:32 on the same day as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant damaged objects being used by public offices, such as that one waste boom (an amount equivalent to KRW 20,00) stored in a district zone is broken down by the right generated from the fact that the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the E zone located in Busan Shipping Daegu H, Busan, and entered the district and became fired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of the crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties under Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Code, the crimes are more severe G.