At around 10:50 on March 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the “D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D) and Si expenses were to be paid to the above victim; and (b) expressed the victim’s desire to read “cp and dog hh” from the victim that the victim “dhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Summary of Evidence

1.Statement of Witness E

1. Images of CCTV images;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph the victim's photograph or dynamic images;

1. The defendant asserts that Article 260 (1) of the relevant Article of the Criminal Code of the relevant criminal facts and the defendant's argument on the defendant's argument on the selection of imprisonment with prison labor had first expressed his/her desire before and out of the above upper point, and the defendant resisted that he/she was flicker, and the defendant was flicked with flick, and the victim was flicked with flick, and the defendant was flicked with flick, and the defendant was blick with flick with his/her hand floor, and the victim was blick with flick with his

In full view of the statements made in the investigative agency of the witness E and in this court, and the CCTV video CD images, the Defendant made payment by credit card around 9:24 minutes in the process of entering the instant office around 5:00 on March 6, 2013, and the Defendant did not have any particular dispute between the Defendant and the Defendant at the time (the witness E’s statement, evidence record 42, CD 20130306 file image). On March 8, 2013, around 50:0:00, the Defendant used the instant office and used the credit card and tried the conflict with the victim (the Defendant appears to have raised any comments and comments during the said process). As such, the Defendant calculated around 51:54 seconds in the process of calculating the victim and the victim at around 10:51 minutes in first.