beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.05.01 2012고단477

사기등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

The evidence of No. 900235 of the Criminal Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, 201.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 12, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Changwon District Court on July 9, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 9, 201.

Defendant

C On August 23, 2006, the Changwon District Court sentenced three years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for special larceny to one year, and became final and conclusive on August 31, 2006. On June 26, 2008, the same court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for special larceny and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 14, 2008, and completed the execution of the sentence in Busan Prison on March 3, 2009.

Defendant

E on May 18, 2012, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and two years of suspended execution on October 10, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 19, 2013.

[2012 Highest 477] On November 30, 2010, Defendant A stated that “In order to provide the victim with a document establishing a security for the above Acccus vehicle, the victim would be able to operate the ccoo vehicle within the above Ecoo vehicle, the market price of which is 15 million won or more in the name of the coo vehicle. If 800,000,000 won is extended, Defendant A would be able to pay interest every 3.20,000 won per month. If interest is in arrears for 60 days or more, Defendant A would be able to create a security for the above Ecoo vehicle or transfer its ownership.”

As a result, Defendant A did not deliver the above Ecuas car as security to the victim and operated it directly. The fact does not have any particular property or income at the time of the above borrowing, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above borrowed money in excess of the debt, since there was a debt of KRW 10 million to KRW 70 million, and the above borrowed money was more than KRW 70 million.

Defendant

A, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim, that is, he received 8 million won from the victim as the borrowed money from the victim.

[2012 Highest 570]

1. Defendant A, C, and .