A. The Defendant’s harmful act against the Plaintiff was committed on July 17, 2014, on the ground that the E-building in the D School located in Chungcheong-gun C, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, was in talk with the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff was in talked with the Plaintiff, thereby causing injuries to the Plaintiff, i.e., the high-speed plate (Garo 38 cm, vertical 30 cm), which is a dangerous object in the location of the Plaintiff’s conversation, by hand, was collected toward the Plaintiff, while serving the Plaintiff for approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant harmful act”). B.

As a result of the relevant criminal case, the Defendant was indicted for the above criminal facts (the case of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) in Youngju District Court’s Yeongdeungpo-dong Branch 2014 Highest 214 Highest 214). On December 11, 2014, the first instance court sentenced the Defendant to a judgment ordering two years of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service with respect to the Defendant. 2) The Defendant and the Prosecutor appealed all of the first instance judgment.

(Cheongju District Court 2015No34). The second instance court reversed the judgment below and sentenced the defendant to two years of imprisonment.

Although the Defendant appealed (Supreme Court Decision 2015Do9827), the Supreme Court rendered a ruling dismissing the appeal on August 6, 2015, the judgment of the second instance became final and conclusive as it is.

【Entry of evidence No. 1 of this Court, significant facts in this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition of the liability for damages, the defendant committed an illegal act of assaulting and injuring the plaintiff, and therefore, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for the damages incurred thereby.

[On the other hand, in light of the developments leading up to the occurrence of the harmful act of this case, there is no reason to limit the defendant's liability to the defendant. 3. The scope of damages against the plaintiff shall be as follows:

Provided, That the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis.