A, F and H Imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, each of the defendants B, C, D, E, G, and I shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months.

except that this judgment.

Defendant

A is the whole of the “K”, which is a motor vehicle parts supplier, and Defendant B is the factory head of the above company, Defendant C is the manufacturing director of the above company, Defendant D is the business director of the above company, Defendant D is the management director of the above company, and Defendant E is the management director of the above company.

Defendant

F is the head of “M (the location: N) Development Institute,” which is a motor vehicle parts supplier, and Defendant G is the vice head of the company.

Defendant

H는 2016. 1. 경부터 2017. 8. 25. 경까지 양산시 O에 있는 P 운영의 피해자 ‘ ㈜Q’ 의 공장장이었고, 피고인 I은 2015. 10. 경부터 2017. 8. 25. 경까지 피해 회사의 과장이었던 사람이다.

The company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company. The company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company of the company.

The 7 persons, including Defendant A, etc., who are employees of the above secondary subcontractor, were expected to suffer damage to the above secondary subcontractor due to the damage company, such as failure to meet the delivery date, and were asked to return the automobile parts to the victim. However, the victim was rejected, and there was a mind that Defendant H and Defendant I, who did not receive wages, etc. from the victimized company, did not intrude into the victimized company with Defendant I, thereby thefting the metal type, etc. necessary for the manufacture of the automobile parts.

Pursuant to the above program, the Defendants were gathered in the vicinity of the damaged company around 02:00 on August 22, 2017, and the following, Defendant B, Defendant E, and Defendant H incidental to the entrance door locks beyond their fences, Defendant F, and Defendant G moved the number-off cargo difference of the operation of the damaged company parked on the access road to another place.