정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The Defendant in the facts charged in the instant case is No. C and No. 2016, and the victim D are No. 3 and No. 2015.
On May 7, 2020, the Defendant: (a) informed of gender-related relationship between the victim and the Defendant’s female-friendly G, and (b) informed of the fact that the victim and the Defendant’s female-friendly G had kneeeee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne
The Defendant, at around 03:12 on the same day, visited B University C and 3 grade 48 students, and posted a photograph taken as above, with the words “H”, after having access to the Kakakao Stockholm group hosting room where 48 students were enrolled.
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging facts openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance (Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.);
B. On September 15, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to punish the victim.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);