beta
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2020.05.20 2019나50807

건물등철거

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. Defendant AA in this Court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part on April 2), except to modify the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2) and supplement or add the judgment as stated in the following paragraph (3).

2. To modify “Defendant M” in the 5th 4 pages of the modified part to “the network M”.

The five (5) of the five (5) line “A” succeeds to the deceased’s inheritance ratio of Defendant H, N,O, and P, each of which is the deceased’s children, on March 19, 2019, and the said Defendants owned one-fourths of each of the two buildings of this case. Defendant H, N,O, and P were amended to the effect that the instant legal proceedings were taken over on November 25, 2019, following the pronouncement of the first instance judgment.

5 The 10th page "Defendant D" shall be modified to "the network D".

The 5th 12th 12th son was the owner, and “The deceased was the owner.” The deceased died on May 23, 2019, and both AB, a spouse of the deceased, AC, AD, AE, the son of the Deceased, AE, and AF have renounced inheritance, and the mother of the Deceased was the owner of the instant 4th son. The Defendant AA was the owner of the instant 4th son on March 24, 2020, after the first instance judgment was rendered.”

6 8 pages and each “M” of the following 8 to 7 shall be deleted:

6 The 6th nine parallels and the following 7th parallels shall be modified to “A”.

3. Supplement and addition of judgments;

A. Defendant B, other than Defendant L, claimed to conclude a land lease agreement with the remaining Defendants, around December 2005, around May 2003, Defendant C entered into a land lease agreement with the previous owner of each of the instant land and on May 3, 1982, around December 199, with the network D, and around June 2005, Defendant E entered into a land lease agreement with the former owner of each of the instant land and for the purpose of owning a building. < Amended by Act No. 7873, Nov. 16, 1987; Act No. 3574, May 3, 1982>

The deceased and the Defendants shall register the ownership of the buildings of this case 1 through 6.