1. Around July 7, 2016, Defendant C purchased accommodation tickets at the victim’s home located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Defendant B’s home and on the bulletin board of the country.

In order to raise an writing and cost of living, “D accommodation tickets will be sold in KRW 230,00” by approaching the victim.

“Alongly, the victim sent a text message to the victim’s Hand.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell accommodation tickets to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 230,000 won, including KRW 100,000 on the same day from the victim, and KRW 130,000 on the following day, from the victim to the Defendant’s bank account.

2. Around August 12, 2016 high group 3309 Defendant E wishes to purchase a hotel hotel accommodation ticket in Seoul at the home of the Defendant located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 12, 2016.

In order to report the comments posted “” and to raise living expenses, the victim will have access to sell F hotel accommodation tickets to KRW 500,000.

“False speech sent a text message to the victim’s Handphone.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the F hotel accommodation right to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 500,000 won from the victim to the Korean bank account of the defendant on the same day.

3. On August 3, 2016, Defendant 201, Defendant 4081, sold “G hotel accommodation tickets” on the Internet NAV in a non-place and on the website of the country.

A notice stating “If you send 200,000 won, I will sell G hotel accommodation tickets to the victim H who reported and contacted the above writing.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the above hotel accommodation right.

The Defendant is identical to this.