However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on April 15, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 15, 2017.

1. The fraud defendant and the defendant C, around September 16, 2013, planned to receive the investment from the priority investors and to pay the profits to the senior investors. Although the investors did not intend to make a profit by investing the money in any other place, the defendant introduced the victim E as the representative director and made a false statement to the effect that "if the defendant is a company that introduces the gambling site in the UK, he/she may pay a large amount of money for 100,000 won per day if he/she invests 1.3 million won per day, he/she shall be introduced as the victim and the defendant C, as the chief director, shall be the victim and shall be given a 1.3 million won per day from the damaged person under the pretext of investment.

9. 23. Minority: 1.3 million won, and the same year.

9. 25. Around 25.3 million won and around 1.3 million won in around 1.1 of the same year respectively.

As a result, the Defendant and the Defendant C had conspiredd the victim as above, and received a total of 5.2 million won from the injured party four times.

(b) No person who violates the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts and Subordinate Statutes shall engage in any similar receiving business of raising funds from many and unspecified persons without obtaining authorization or permission, making registration or report, etc. under other Acts and subordinate statutes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and Defendant C stated at the date and time stated in Section 2-A, and at the place stated in Section 2-A, that the indictment is 5.4 million won in total from E, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error of 5.2 million won in writing, and thus, it was corrected without a separate amendment process. The Defendant and Defendant C received similar receipts by delivery.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 7003"

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant and the defendant C

1. Statement of the police statement to E;