For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court convicted the victim Q Q of fraud around January 15, 2016 among the facts charged in the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of fraud.

Of the facts charged in this case, there is an error of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of fraud against the victimO. The defendant's ground of appeal is not alleged in the ground of appeal, since the court below did not consider it as the ground of appeal or ex

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.