However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 31, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s bulletin board “galthot 2 mobile phones sold” on the Defendant’s cell phone despite having no intent to send galthot 2 mobile phones even if he received the money from the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju City, Gwangju City, 103 Dong 101, 101, and when he returns money to the victim D who reported and contacted galthot 2, he would send galthot 2, and he would receive 160,000 won from the victim D to the Defendant’s deposit account in the Nonghyup Bank, a female student, from January 15, 2014, including the transfer of 160,000 won from the victim D to the Defendant’s female member’s bank account, which is the Defendant’s mother employee, from January 15, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each written statement of D, G, H and I;

1. A specification of transactions;

1. Application of each relevant statute;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act include a previous conviction of a fine of five times due to a crime of fraud. However, considering the fact that the defendant was committed by committing a crime, and the defendant was committed by himself, and deposited money to the victims, the punishment shall be determined as per the order.