2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

On December 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the E restaurant located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, Seoul-si, that read, “The victim F(45 tax) and the victim who had not been paid wages during the period of drinking.” (b) the victim said, “I would going to do so any longer; (c) the victim said, “I would go to Seoul,” thereby gathering the 500CC beer mar, which is a dangerous thing that I would go to go to go to the Republic of Korea; and (d) 2 times the head of the victim’s head was laid down, and the victim said two weeks of the victim’s head was required to receive approximately two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. An investigation report (to hear statements from the victim by telephone);

1. Request for cooperation in investigation and report on investigation (on dispatch, etc. to the scene);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Social Service Order and Article 62-2 of the same Act, and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, etc. of Social Service Order, is a crime of this case where the defendant disembarked the victim's 500cc bether with the victim's c bether with 50cc bether with the victim's c bether with the length of 5cc bether

However, the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, and against whom the Defendant did not receive wages of KRW 27 million against the victim, and the Defendant merely referred to as “Seoul Ara” to the Defendant who was making it difficult for the victim to receive wages, which led to the Defendant’s failure to pay wages, and the Defendant committed the instant crime after determining that the victim did not have any intent to pay wages.

The defense for the defendant is partly exempted from taking into account some of the motive for the above crime, the victim does not want to punish the defendant, and the defendant was punished for violence in the past.