임금 및 공사대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,800,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from December 25, 2013 to May 3, 2016, and the following.
1. The facts following the facts are either in dispute between the parties or in part of Gap evidence 1, evidence 1, evidence 2, 3-2, and evidence 5-1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence 6-1, 2, 3, and Eul's testimony and in part of Eul evidence 22-1, and evidence 22-2, and witness B and C shall not interfere with the following acknowledgement.
(1) On December 3, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with the E (hereinafter referred to as “D”) under which the Defendant entered into a contract with the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) for the construction of steel reinforced concrete (hereinafter referred to as “Gang”) during the construction of the research institute’s extension that the Defendant contracted with F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”).
5. Amount under a contract for supply: 90% of the direct construction cost;
6. Payment of the price;
(a) Advance: No one; and
(b) Terms and Conditions of Claim and Payment (1) monthly: 100% of cash (2) the last day of the following month after a request for the payment (3) the last day of the following month (Provided, That the settlement of accounts carried forward when a delay is delayed for at least seven days);
C. (1) If the price is adjusted and paid due to any change in the design, the economic situation, etc., and (2) if the price is changed, the agreement shall be deemed as a “refinite” but it is reasonable to view the agreement as a “refinite” in light of the purport of the context.
On December 3, 2012, D submitted a faithful performance statement that (2) settlement measures based on the original contract details at the time of the occurrence of the construction work are directly executed and that it is not delegated to a third party.
B. Around November 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract with D to give a subcontract to D for the structural construction works that the Defendant contracted from F (hereinafter referred to as “heatized construction works”) among the construction works that the Defendant contracted from F.
(A) A contract for the construction project shall not be entered into in an oral statement.
(1) The plaintiff did not have a construction license at the time of the contract for the construction work for the plaintiff's package subcontract.
(2) The Plaintiff is the introduction of D’s G.