beta
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2016.06.01 2016가단1679

임금

Text

1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) KRW 8,700,000 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and KRW 5,870,000 to the Selection B, and KRW 4,305,00 to the Selection C, respectively.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff (party) and the appointed parties were employed by the Defendant who is engaged in the business of manufacturing vessel components, and the Plaintiff (party officer) retired from the service from June 1, 2015; the Selection B and C from June 8, 2015; and the Selection D and E from June 15, 2015 to July 24, 2015, respectively.

B. However, the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff (Appointed) and the Appointeds KRW 8,700,000 to June 2015 and July 7, 2015, namely, Plaintiff (Appointeds)’s KRW 5,870,00, KRW 34,305,000 to the Appointeds, KRW 43,990,00 to the Appointeds, and KRW 4,075,00 to the Appointeds E, without having agreed to extend the due date for payment between the parties.

C. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed party the aforementioned unpaid wages and the amount thereof at the rate of 20% per annum from August 8, 2015 to the date of full payment from August 8, 2015 to the date of full payment under the Labor Standards Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings on the ground of recognition (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);