However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Category B spectrum vehicle.

On February 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.081% around 00:35, and led to the passing of the DNA singing in Pyeongtaek-si C from the side of the Sungdong Elementary School to the Samsung Bio-resources.

At the time, there are many vehicles parked on both sides of the road, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely check the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform sob and proceeded with the Defendant’s negligence while driving on the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction, followed the left side of the FK5 car owned by the victim E(the age of 34) and shocked the part above the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G (V, 30 years of age) who was in the victim E’s vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures) at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) above, as in paragraph (1) above, followed by the left-hand side of FK5 car owned by the victim E (34 years old) and continued to meet and continue to proceed on the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and re-infilled the part of the victim H(32 years old), which was parked on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s moving direction, into the front-hand part of the Defendant’s driving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to occupational negligence like the above paragraph (1), destroyed the repair cost of KRW 1,482,765, such as the replacement of the victim E, and the replacement of the victim HH vehicle, and escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle and taking necessary measures, even though the Defendant destroyed the repair cost of KRW 1,505,810, such as the replacement of the front offender.

Summary of Evidence

1...