Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant, at around 17:00 on March 23, 2016, had a dispute about the settlement of insurance proceeds with the victim B, an adjuster at the fifth floor of the South University Hospital, Nam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, about 80, 2016, and other patients have been heard by the other patients, and there is no basic for the victim to whom he had “a few lives or drinks making the tea shotus to do so,”

In order to raise 30,00 won per day of hospitalization, B CC’s parents want to report once, and B’s words “the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person in question,” thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement concerning C in a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police;

1. Statement made by the police on the victim;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in recording records;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.