beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.28 2020나54397

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal shall be the first instance.

Reasons

1. At the time of the occurrence of the basic fact-finding accident, the non-party vehicle (G) in the situation of the collision of the road in front of the F station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul at the location of around 19:00 on September 21, 2018, the non-party vehicle in the situation of the collision of the road (G) in front of the F station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, reported the vehicle of the defendant who changed the vehicle from the two lanes to the one, and the vehicle of the plaintiff following the non-party vehicle after which the plaintiff followed the non-party vehicle 2:

A. The circumstances surrounding the instant accident are as follows.

B. The Plaintiff paid KRW 686,60,00, after deducting KRW 200,000,000 of the Plaintiff’s automobile injury insurance money and KRW 2,230,920, and KRW 3,676,840 of the substitute damages to the Plaintiff’s driver H, and KRW 9,289,79,790 of the substitute damages to the Nonparty’s driver.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 14, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers) and images

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's vehicle was driven by the non-party vehicle in order to avoid this due to the provision of the cause of the change of the vehicle to a sudden step to get out of the two lanes fixed by the defendant vehicle, and accordingly, the plaintiff's vehicle behind the non-party vehicle was driven by the non-party vehicle. Thus, the plaintiff's negligence is recognized.

나. 판단 위 인정사실에 다가 앞서 든 각 증거와 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 운전자는 같은 방향으로 가고 있는 앞차의 뒤를 따르는 경우에는 앞차가 갑자기 정지하게 되는 경우 그 앞차와의 충돌을 피할 수 있는 필요한 거리를 확보하여야 하는데( 도로 교통법 제 19조 제 1 항), 원고 차량은 선행 차량이 정지할 경우에 충돌을 피할 수 있는 안전거리를 확보하지 않고 주행한 과실로 이 사건 사고를 초래한 점, 피고 차량이 좌측 방향지시 등을 켠 상태에서 2 차로에서 1 차로로 차로변경을 하였고 이에...