However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 1, 2020, the Defendant damaged 2,000 won of the market price owned by the victim C, 200 won, 2,000 won of the 200-20-20-20-17-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-30-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-3

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report from 112 at the date, time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, shall report the G of the F District belonging to the Jung-gu Police Station, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the extent that the Defendant “I ambom,” and

shall be raised, and the feass of feass, packs of feass, and discarded.

“I ambling to “,” and assaulted the left part of the police officer to the right part of the said police officer’s hand on two occasions at the right part.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods on the ground that he was arrested as a current offender on the grounds of the suspicion of damage to the said goods and interference with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and was unable to wear locking on his hand in the course of moving the said FJ patrol vehicle to the H patrol vehicle, thereby damaging the Defendant’s repair cost by walking the back of the driver’s seat on the side of the said patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. A report on internal investigation (on-site conditions, etc.);

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Photographs materials (on-site and damaged photographs);

1. An investigation report (related to a written estimate for repair expenses);

1. Investigation report (to secure a net H Babbbbox image not being secured);

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on the site inspection of the incident, CCTV images at a restaurant;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 (the most severe punishment) of the Criminal Code for the aggravation of concurrent crimes.