2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

1) The name of the administrative district was changed from November 4, 2004 to "Yanananan City" on the following grounds: G (G and the address in the certificate of repayment) (the name of the administrative district was changed from November 4, 2004.

J) around 1950, A’s Certificate No. 1 (Certificate of Repayment) was written in the short-term 4283 years, and the month and date of publication are not written. ① 1,182, 1,182, 2, L previously 350, 360 square meters and 360 square meters are completed in distribution under the Farmland Reform Act, and each of the above lands was completed on April 29, 1959 due to the completion of repayment as of December 31, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as “UUri-ri 0”).

2) The F.C. 360 square meters at issue in this case was divided and merged as follows:

- Division on January 22, 1974: 123 square meters before F. 123 square meters (the land category is changed to the same site, 407 square meters thereafter, and the land category is changed to the religious site on October 2, 200), 237 square meters before E. (the area is converted to 783 square meters thereafter, and the land category is changed to the religious site on August 8, 1995) - Division - On October 2, 200, 57 square meters for V religion, 625 square meters forO religion, 407 square meters for E religious site, 783 square meters for E religious site, and 1872 square meters for E religious E. 18 square meters for the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer registration under the name of the Defendant’s 197 square meters for E. 197 square meters for E religious site and 1972 square meters for E religious site, and the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer registration under the name of E. 1973 square meters for E.

The plaintiff is a partner of H. H.