When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane car.

On November 21, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on November 21, 2014, and proceeded ahead of the E station located in D at Seosan City, to Daejeon.

At the time, a crosswalk is installed on a road that had been at night, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and tried to find out the Victim F (75 years old) of the Victim F (the 75 years old), which was moving on the right side of the front side from the left side by negligence, and received the full part of the car driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant caused the death of the victim on the same day due to the negligence in the above business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement made by the defendant in compliance with this Act in this court;

1. Statement prepared by the police as to the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each description and image suitable for the report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a actual condition survey report, photographs of the scene of the accident, and a situation report;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes making it appropriate for a private person described in the judgment, among written autopsy and written autopsy records;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Optional to Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines

2. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention of the workhouses are as follows: (a) the Defendant caused the death of the victim by occupational negligence as stated in the judgment of the court; and (b) thus, (c) the illegality is small.

However, the defendant paid 30,000,000 won to the bereaved family members of the victim as criminal agreement, G, which is the bereaved family members of the victim, does not want to be punished by the defendant, the above car operated by the defendant was covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance, and the defendant is divided into crimes.