However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

The Defendants, who want to drink alcohol in Ansan-si, a member-si, and drink money, walked up to their house in Sinsan-si, Annsan-si, a bicycle parked in the first area located in 620 as the center of the member-gu, Ansan-si, an Ansan-si, with a view to getting off and gathering the bicycle.

On August 31, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendants led the bicycle storage box in the front area, Defendant A, who was unable to know the market price owned by the victim’s name and the unrested victim’s name. Defendant B, who was corrected only with the rear wheels, led the front wheels of the Myanmar bicycle with the rear wheels of the victim D.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victims' property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Bicycle photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (victim D telephone communications);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are against the Defendants in the suspension of execution (the Defendants). There is no record of criminal punishment; the victim D does not want the Defendants’ punishment but appears to have returned other damaged bicycles; and other factors such as the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the age of the Defendants, character and conduct, environment, etc.