2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was aware of all the facts of the crime and actively cooperates with investigation agencies to avoid the same crime in the future, the amount and the frequency of medication used for the crime of this case are considerable, the defendant has been punished for imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime several times, the crime related to narcotics requires strict punishment in terms of social harm and danger of recidivism, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the records, considering the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the above argument by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.