When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 16, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Daejeon District Court, which became final and conclusive on January 24, 2014.

On July 20, 2013, the Defendant received a request from the Public Procurement Service to make it possible for the Defendant to deliver creambles, etc. produced from the victim E to the Public Procurement Service after August 2012, 2012 from the D office located in Asan-si, Asan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant is able to help the victim to deliver the F to the Public Procurement Service through her friendship with the knowledge of the head of the procurement Gu.

referring to the damage, from July 22, 2013 to the same year.

8. From August 7, 2013 to August 13, 2013, a total of 4.5 million won was paid in cash on the pretext of solicitation, and had the victim approve the oil payment on behalf of the victim in lieu of the oil payment.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the cases handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the part concerning H in the suspect examination protocol against the accused in the prosecution;

1. Statement in each protocol made by the prosecution against E and I;

1. Statement of investigation report (H telephone investigation);

1. To enter the suspect's list of crimes, deposits without passbook, copies of the certificate of deposit of passbook, and the detailed statement of transactions of passbook; and each statement of transactions of ordinary deposits;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes described in inquiries about criminal history, the text of the judgment (Sacheon-gu 2013 High Court Decision 937), and the text of the judgment (Sacheon-gu 2013 No. 2908)

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 111 (1) of the Act (in all cases, referring to the selection of fines) by an attorney at the option of punishment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The late text of Article 116 of the Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the crime of this case.