A. Plaintiff North Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd”) is a corporation established for the purpose of operating a private teaching institute, etc., and is currently operating a private teaching institute established at each branch in the name of “social graduate school.”

The Defendant joined the Plaintiff Company on March 18, 201 and retired from office on November 10, 2014, served as C instructor at the NA (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”) operated by the Plaintiff Company, and was D at the time of retirement.

B. As above, the Defendant submitted to the Plaintiff Company on October 28, 2014 and retired from office on November 10, 2014, in mind that it separately operated a private teaching institute or teaching school while in office.

The Defendant, as of the date of the Plaintiff’s submission, prepared a “security maintenance pledge” to the effect that the Plaintiff’s teaching materials, samples, and student information will not be leaked, and submitted it to the Plaintiff Company.

C. From early 2014 to November 4, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily removed the documents of 1,165 copies, including the teaching materials, student information-related documents, internal documents of the instant private teaching institute, and materials for education of employees, which were kept within the computer system after the Defendant retired from the Plaintiff’s company, for the purpose of using at the time of riding a private teaching institute or a teaching school.

On July 3, 2015, the defendant filed a summary order on the same facts as larceny, and the summary order was issued to be punished by a fine of three million won for larceny, but the defendant filed a request for formal trial.

In addition, around October 2014, when the Defendant was in office at the instant private teaching institute, the Defendant told students of the class that “if you leave this private teaching institute, they did not have a student to give this lessons properly” and conducted an investigation as to whether the Defendant is a student of the instant private teaching institute if he left this private teaching institute or another teaching school.

In addition, the private teaching institute of this case is a student of the Daegu High School and the Second High School in charge of the defendant's lecture.