2. The fact that the Defendants divided and reflected the mistakes, and the Defendants are juveniles under the Juvenile Act and have not yet formed their personality until now, and they reflect the crimes during the period of handout, and their family members have provided their intent to protect the Defendants, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

However, the Defendants had a large number of special theft records, and re-offending despite the period of protection observation by receiving juvenile protective disposition due to the same kind of crime, and the time, place, and object of entertainment expenses fall off, can see the attitude of law and order light in that they committed a non-discriminatory crime without being subject, the victims' damages have not been properly recovered, and in full view of the circumstances before and after the instant crime was committed, the Defendants' age, sexual conduct, occupation and environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below to the Defendants is deemed appropriate, and it is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the Defendants are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.