beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.09.01 2016고단1462

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 27, 2013, the Defendant was subject to the disposition of larceny from the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor's Office on February 19, 2014, theft from the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office on March 19, 2014, special larceny from the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor's Office on September 29, 2014, special larceny from the Incheon Western District Public Prosecutor's Office on September 29, 2014, violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes from the Goyang Branch's High Court on October 21, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 16, 2016, the Defendant habitually stolen: (a) around 09:35, at “DPC room” located on the first floor of Goyang-gu C building in Goyangyang-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) the victim E games, and (c) the victim E games, who was locked, was stolen by having one copy of the resident registration certificate owned by the victim, which was located on the table, and one copy of the HyundaiM card, and one copy of the Twit Card, which contains one 500,000 won of the market price.

In addition, from April 16, 2016 to May 19, 2016, the Defendant stolen six victims of a total amount of KRW 2,858,00 of the market price on six occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. On May 4, 2016, from around 10:00 to 17:00 of the same day, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “HPC room” operated by the victim G in Goyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul, that “The Defendant would perform the Internet game and pay the PC charge” to the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the fee to the victim even if the PC services are provided by the victim because there is no money in water.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of 8,700 won in a way that did not pay 8,700 won corresponding to the fee even though the Defendant received the PC services from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement in the preparation of I, E, J, G, K, L and M;

1. Each protocol of seizure;