beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고단4744

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant refused to withdraw, and the Defendant, from June 22, 2017 to June 18:14, 2017, at the victim C’s D building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (a) transferred clothes to an infant; (b) was entering the fake building; (c) was entering the office, opening the door of each office from the first to the fifth fifth floor; and (d) was suffering from disturbance; and (c) was demanded to request from the injured person before the third floor sugar of the said building, the Defendant would grow up to four.

Non-felon dead shall be discarded.

"In addition, the victim's chest and shoulder are pushed together once every time, and the police officers called up after receiving a report have continued to stay there until they arrive.

Accordingly, the defendant refused to comply with the demand of the victim to leave without any justifiable reason, and assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the above time and place, as seen above, laid off the warehouse door of the first floor of the building in which the Defendant was suffering from disturbance several times to cover the repairing cost of KRW 7.50,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

3. On June 22, 2017, the Defendant who obstructed the performance of official duties was requested to arrest a flagrant offender and to board the patrol vehicle by the police officer assigned to the Seoul Southern Police Station G police box called out after receiving a report in front of the F Council members located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, at around 18:20 on June 22, 2017.

Marbr.

In addition, the death shall be discarded at all times.

“In one hand, she was booming a ebbbbbbat of H.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the warehouse on the first floor damaged and investigation reports (attached to receipts for repair of warehouse documents related to the crime of destroying property);

1. Article 319(2), Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (which does not comply with the eviction), and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act for the crime.