A. On December 19, 191, C entered into a mortgage agreement with the Defendant with regard to the real estate indicated in the No. 1 of the attached property list and the forest and field D 23,107 square meters (hereinafter “forest and field before division”) located in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, in relation to the establishment of a mortgage for the establishment of a neighboring mortgage, with the maximum debt amount of KRW 15,00,000, the debtor C and the debtor as the defendant. On December 20, 1991, C concluded a mortgage agreement with the Changwon-dong District Court (hereinafter “the land within the same Ri”) to the above purport as the receipt of No. 16766 on December 20, 191.

(hereinafter “instant collateral security”). B.

Before subdivision, forest land was divided into 7,018 square meters of real estate and E forest land and 7,018 square meters of forest land, 2,275 square meters of forest land as indicated in the table Nos. 2 and 5 of the annexed real estate on February 10, 2009. 2) E forest land was changed into 1995, 12, 18 square meters of forest land, and 7,018 square meters of forest land into roads. On February 26, 2016, land was divided into 3 real estate listed in the table No. 828 square meters of real estate and G road, and 806 square meters of forest road.

3) On February 26, 2016, F forest land 2,275 square meters was divided into the real estate indicated in the table Nos. 4 and 6 of the attached real estate and the 1,344 square meters of I forest land. (c) The Plaintiff who completed the registration of transfer of ownership is a real estate indicated in the attached real estate indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(B) On March 2, 2016, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 2, 2016 by the Changwon District Court subordinate District Court No. 3372 (No. 3372).

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) around 2002, C repaid in full the secured obligation of the instant right to collateral security. 2) The secured obligation of the instant right to collateral security has become extinctive prescription.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) On June 30, 2003, C did not repay the secured debt of the instant right to collateral security (such as payment of interest of KRW 250,000). 2) The Plaintiff promised to recover the Defendant around March 2016 to pay the Plaintiff’s debt, and thus, the Plaintiff’s extinctive prescription period.