However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 10, 2018, at around 02:50, the Defendant walked in front of the C cafeteria in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, while under the influence of alcohol, and became a D and Sivic with which the Defendant had provided a passenger with a view to his body, and a witness reported to 112.

Around 03:05 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the Defendant at the foregoing place that the Defendant reported 112 as the foregoing circumstances and sent to the G District E District of the Gwangju Western Police Station, and expressed to the Defendant that “I would like to see the Defendant; (b) there was a defect that the Defendant tried to see; (c) the Defendant’s her ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his amblst; and (d) her ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his embl with his embl with his embl with his ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his ambl with his embl with his embl with the Defendant

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the part of violence;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. On the grounds of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the following circumstances and the defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as set forth in the text.

The fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and the victim wanted to have his wife.