A. Although the Defendant did not carry a knife (hereinafter “instant knife”) with the intent to use for committing an act of violence, etc., the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by misunderstanding the fact.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In the lower court’s argument of mistake of facts, the Defendant argued to the same effect as this part of the grounds for appeal, and the lower court: (i) “The time of the instant crime was 4:30 times of the instant crime; (ii) the Defendant appears to have no reason to carry a different knife as the place of the crime; (iii) the Defendant was in a dispute with the female friendly of the Defendant; (iv) the Defendant was in the process of having knife the knife with the knife; and (iv) the Defendant said that knife the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif k around knif.

In full view of the purport of “the fact that the Defendant carried the instant blade, which is a dangerous object that might be used for violent crimes without justifiable grounds, can be sufficiently recognized.”

The above circumstances that the court below rendered are ① the witness of the party deliberation.