When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 24, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on April 1, 2016 due to a violation of the Act on Business of Fraud, Theft, and Credit Specialized Financial Business by the Busan District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 1, 2016.

On March 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “C” located in B of Busan Northern District, around 01:00, the Defendant: (b) took advantage of the gap between the victim D in cash 2.3 million won and the mobile phone market value; and (c) took advantage of the gap in the toilet, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s 100,000 won and 1 bitcot equivalent to the market value of 600,000 won.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in connection with the preparation of D;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each judgment and the results of the search of the net case;

1. Article 259 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 259 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Subsequent to Article 37 of the Criminal Act concerning the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) (the punishment shall be mitigated in consideration of equity between the cases where a judgment is rendered simultaneously with the cases of fraud, etc. in which judgment becomes final and conclusive

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;