However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 2, 2016, Defendant A, at around 19:30 on around 19:30, at a hole without a trade name, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim B (the 47 years of age) who fests alcohol alone franites 2 sick in the same line; and (b) provided the victim with the finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite; and (c) provided the victim with the victim’s left side finite finite finite

2. Defendant B, at the temporary location as referred to in paragraph 1, on the grounds as referred to in paragraph 1, and on the grounds as referred to in paragraph 1, Defendant B and the victim A (5 years old) who is the same as that of the same kind of knife, knife, with the knife of the victim’s left head on one occasion by leaving the part of the victim’s left head on one occasion by putting the victim’s face on one occasion, and thereby, Defendant B sustained the victim’s knife with the knife of the knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Copy of the B medical treatment record;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the scene of the case, a shoulder glass bottle, and the suspect's body photograph;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and subparagraph A of the option of punishment: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 258-2(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B who is to be mitigated: Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who observe the protection and observation: The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that Defendant A committed the instant crime even though he had the history of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the degree of injury that Defendant B suffered, etc., the Defendant’s liability is not less than that of the crime, but the Defendant’s violation of his criminal act, the agreement with Defendant B was reached, and the Defendant’s penalty is imposed.