except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 6. 17. 02:58 경 울산 남구 중앙로 17번 길 16 선 경 그린아파트 2동 엘리베이터에서, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 울산 남부 경찰서 B 지구대 소속 경장 C이 술에 취해 자고 있는 피고인을 깨우자, 술에 만취하여 사물을 변별할 능력이나 의사를 결정할 능력이 부족한 상태에서 입에 담을 수 없는 욕설을 하면서 C의 가슴을 양손으로 때리고 멱살을 잡아 수회 흔들고 오른발로 C의 허벅지를 수회 찼다.

After all, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties to prevent crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical drugs;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Class 1 (Interference with and Compelling of Duties) [Special Sentencing] mitigated element: Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor: (a) mitigated element: Imprisonment with labor for not less than one month to eight months (the scope of recommendation); (b) comprehensive comparison and evaluation of the grounds for suspended execution [the scope of suspended execution] positive factors: Where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, it shall be deemed that there is no serious reflective reason, or there is no criminal record of not less than a suspended execution.

2. Six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended sentence;