On May 15, 2015, when the comprehensive construction and the development of the new generation industry waives the foundation construction of the building, it concluded a contract with the victim G by obtaining a loan from the government support fund for the building construction.

However, the defendant filed a lawsuit to the Incheon District Court to the effect that the victim G did not pay the above construction cost of KRW 379,920,000 against the defendant (2013 provisional 7116).

A. On October 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) received a private document forgery from the owner of the building by using a color pen for the construction site of Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si; and (b) “I will receive KRW 300,000,000,000,000 won of the steel bars in the blank to the owner A.

on October 30, 2012

J, after indicating “J”, has been signed by the J in writing on the side of the J.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a receipt in the name of J, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On July 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) presented to the Incheon District Court one copy of the forged receipt as if it were a document duly formed; and (b) exercised the said investigation document.

(c)

(1) On October 24, 2012, the Defendant paid the remainder of KRW 20 million for the construction cost of the steel to the J in charge of the management of the steel-related 3-dong construction of the said new construction loan, and there is no fact that the Defendant paid the remainder of KRW 20 million.

Nevertheless, on July 11, 2013, the Defendant submitted a forged receipt as above, as if he received the payment for the construction of the steel bars in the 12 civil department of Incheon District Court, which is equivalent to KRW 30 million.

The Defendant, as such, is a court.