손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff is a person who vicariously performs the affairs of selling apartment-type factories built in the Seoul and Seoul Metropolitan area as an agent.
Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an agency for the sale of the building E (hereinafter “instant factory”) in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant factory”).
Defendant D and Defendant C entered into a service contract with Defendant B and entered into a sales agency service contract, and Defendant D and Defendant C were the head of the headquarters, and Defendant C were the team leader.
In September 2015, the Plaintiff received a request from the G, F, the team leader of F, the company F, the F, the subsidiary company of F, for water coloring the apartment-type factory to be occupied by H, the company F, the subsidiary company of F, from the G at the same time.
The plaintiff thought that the factory of this case, which had been constructed at the time, is in line with the requirements of G, that is, the area inside and outside the area of 3,000 square meters for employees to move in, and arranged to visit the factory of this case to G.
Therefore, around October 6, 2015, G and F Company I visited the factory sales office of this case with the Plaintiff and met Defendant D.
G discussed the conditions of sale desired by H in its place, and from Defendant D explained that the Jdong of the instant plant is suitable to move in, and the selling price was expressed.
After the passage of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was asked how to review the moving-in of the instant factory to G by means of text message. However, G respondeded to the fact that the location is outside, and the Plaintiff provided G with information on other apartment-type factories.
G around October 27, 2015, with K’s representative director H, visited the factory sales office of this case and consulted with Defendant C, and negotiations necessary for concluding the sales contract through Defendant C were conducted.
Therefore, H Co., Ltd. entered into a sales contract with P Co., Ltd. on November 27, 2015 without the Plaintiff’s involvement with respect to the instant factory L, M, N, andO (a total area of approximately 3,100 square meters) and April 10, 2017.